See what an AI crawler actually reads
Paste your page source. This strips it back to what a crawler that does not execute JavaScript would see, then scores whether each passage is answer-first, self-contained, and quotable — the three things that decide whether a retrieved page gets used in a generated answer.
{{ overallNote }}
Google renders JavaScript. Most AI crawlers do not. That single asymmetry means a page can index perfectly in search and be invisible to an answer engine, which is why the inspector is the wrong place to check — it shows you the page after the scripts have run.
Whether you will actually be cited. It judges structure, and structure is necessary rather than sufficient. It also cannot see whether a crawler is allowed to fetch you at all — that is a robots.txt question, and a blocked page scores nothing regardless of how well it is written.
Every result is visible at once, deliberately. Putting analysis behind accordions on a tool that flags content hidden behind accordions would be a strange choice, and the same logic applies to your pages.
How the four scores are calculated
Stated openly so you can disagree with it. These are heuristics, not measurements of engine behaviour, and nobody outside the labs has the real weights.
Billion Game runs your work through the same instruments the best in-house teams use.
Licences are on us, and every export we pull from them is yours to keep.
Be wary of any agency whose reporting is a tool dashboard with their logo on it. Tools measure; they do not decide what matters, and every one of these will happily generate a hundred findings that change nothing. What you are paying for is the judgement about which three of those hundred are worth your developers’ time.
Questions about extractability
The fuller argument sits on our answer engine optimisation page, and the content-side discipline on generative engine optimisation.
{{ f.a }}